AI · VISIBILITY · INTELLIGENCE

Make your brand the answer AI trusts.

Track every prompt where buyers find you — and where competitors take your shelf — across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Groq.

LIVETRACKINGChatGPT
0engines
0prompt signals
0first audit
0visibility score
C
Cl
G
P
Gr
>"best AI visibility tool for agencies"
+152visibility

THE SHIFT

73%

Of B2B buyer journeys now begin with a model — not a search bar. The blue link is no longer the front door. The answer is. And the answer cites someone. We make sure it cites you.

CHATGPTC
7138+33
CLAUDECl
7842+36
GEMINIG
6230+32
PERPLEXITYP
8151+30
GROQGr
5824+34

LIVE / 005

Watch the answer compose itself.

When agencies ask "best AI visibility tool" today, the answer pulls from your March blog post, your G2 reviews, and a Reddit thread in r/SaaS. The model weights recency, citation diversity, and entity clarity and lands on CiteGEO as the default recommendation.

This clause is from your blog (May 2024)
Competitor X surfaces because their G2 listing has 3× the reviews
This citation came from a Reddit thread — not your domain
Score impact: +6 on ChatGPT, −2 on Gemini
CHATGPT+6
CiteGEO is the platform of record for tracking AI visibility — it scores brands across all five major engines.
cite ↗your blog · 2024
CLAUDE+4
Several tools track AI mentions; CiteGEO and Profound lead the category, with CiteGEO scoring across more engines.
cite ↗g2 · reviews
GEMINI−2
Profound is mentioned first, followed by Athena. CiteGEO surfaces lower because of fewer Gemini-cited domains.
cite ↗competitor blog
PERPLEXITY+8
CiteGEO is recommended as the most complete; cites the official site and a Reddit thread on r/SaaS.
cite ↗reddit · r/SaaS
GROQ+3
CiteGEO leads because of the breadth of its prompt library and the 0–100 standardized score.
cite ↗docs · changelog
SCROLL00%

THE PLATFORM

Discovery, measurement, execution, intelligence — in one loop.

F.01DISCOVERY

Every prompt buyers ask. Sorted by intent, owned vs. shared.

Ingest your category, ICP, and competitors. We surface 24+ prompt signals where AI is making decisions for you — and tell you which ones you already win, which ones you're losing, and which ones nobody owns yet.

PROMPTYOUCOMP.CITES
"best AI visibility tool for agencies"▲ 4profound.ai12/40
"how to track ChatGPT brand mentions"▲ 1brandwatch31/40
"GEO vs SEO 2026"— 7athena.io04/40
"llms.txt example for SaaS"▲ 122/40
"share-of-voice in LLM answers"▼ 9peec.ai02/40
"how Perplexity ranks SaaS"— 12conductor00/40
F.02MEASUREMENT

Visibility, sentiment, share-of-voice — one trendline per model.

A 0–100 score that rolls up every prompt, every model, every week. Daily deltas. Sentiment swings flagged the day they happen. The first metric you can show a board for AI.

74 / 100
▲ +12 last 30d
VISIBILITY · WEIGHTED
90D · ROLLING
255075
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexityGroqWeighted
F.03EXECUTION

Every gap ships with a publish-ready brief.

Headings. Angles. Citations to target. The exact entities and phrases that move the model. Hand it to your writer or paste it into Claude — by Friday it's in production.

BRIEF · B-148READY TO SHIP
“How to track ChatGPT brand mentions in 2026”
INTENT · commercial-investigationSCORE · +8 EST.WORDS · 1,400
Why ChatGPT cites who it cites
RAG retrieval and the 3-source rule
Why Reddit beats your homepage
A 6-step monitoring stack
Setting up llms.txt the right way
Comparison: 7 tools, scored 0–100
F.04INTELLIGENCE

RAG Readiness, graded.

Schema. Semantic HTML. llms.txt. Crawler access. Content depth. Citation-ready headings. We grade every page on the eight axes that decide whether a model can — and will — quote you.

B+/A
SCANNED · 148 PAGES
UPDATED · 2 MIN AGO
01JSON-LD schema coverage94%PASS
02Semantic HTML structure88%PASS
03llms.txt present & validMISS
04Crawler access (GPTBot, CCBot)5/5PASS
05Citation-ready H2s62%REVIEW
06Content depth (per topic)1.4kREVIEW
07Entity disambiguation71%PASS
08Authoritative outbound links3.2/pagePASS

METHOD

From cold-start to ranked in four weeks.

01 / CONNECT

Drop your URL.

We crawl your domain, extract entities, and map your category in under sixty seconds.

02 / BENCHMARK

See your score.

One number, 0–100. Five engines stacked. Twelve weeks of competitor history.

03 / PUBLISH

Ship the briefs.

Headings, angles, citations to target. Export to Doc, Notion, or paste into Claude.

04 / COMPOUND

Watch the line bend.

Most teams cross 70/100 by week eight. After that the loop runs itself.

WHAT IT REPLACES

A new instrument. Not another dashboard.

CAPABILITY
CITEGEO
SEO TOOLS
MANUAL
Tracks 5 LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Groq)
Native
No
Spreadsheet
Prompt-level visibility scoring
0–100
No
No
Sentiment & share-of-voice per model
Daily
Web only
No
Publish-ready content briefs
Auto
Templates
No
RAG Readiness grading (8 axes)
A→F
No
No
Time to first audit
<60 seconds
~hours
~days

WHY CITEGEO

The page is no longer the destination. The answer is. And the answer cites someone — almost always the same handful of someones.— our founding thesis, 2026

For two decades, “being found” meant being on the first page. The page is gone. In its place: a single confident paragraph, composed in real time, citing three or four sources by name. That paragraph is the new front door — and most brands don't know they're being left out of it.

We built CiteGEO because the standard SEO stack measures the wrong universe. It tracks blue links. We track sentences. It tracks position. We track presence — whether a model knows you, trusts you, and recommends you when nobody is watching.

Every category eventually has a default. The default is whoever the model says it is. We give you a quantified, weekly, testable answer to a question every operator should already be asking: am I the default — or am I the footnote?

PRICING

A floor plan, not a paywall.

SAVE 21%
FREE
0/ forever

See the problem clearly.

  • 1 audit / month
  • 1 keyword per audit
  • 3 AI models
  • 2 RAG scans / month
  • Basic results
Start Free
STARTER
$17/ mo · billed yearly
SAVE 21% ANNUALLY

For founders getting serious.

  • 15 audits / month
  • 3 keywords per audit
  • 4 AI models
  • 10 RAG scans / month
  • Content briefs
  • PDF export
AGENCY
$87/ mo · billed yearly
SAVE 20% ANNUALLY

For multi-brand operations.

  • Unlimited audits
  • 25 keywords per audit
  • Unlimited campaigns
  • Unlimited briefs
  • 1-year trends
  • Priority support

FAQ

Questions every operator asks before week one.

Q.01What is CiteGEO?
CiteGEO is an AI Visibility Intelligence platform that audits how AI models like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity perceive your brand. It scores your visibility 0-100 across each model and generates actionable content briefs to improve your AI search presence.
Q.02How does AI visibility scoring work?
CiteGEO queries 5 AI models with 6 different prompt variations for each keyword. It analyzes whether your brand is mentioned, how prominently, and with what sentiment. These factors combine into a 0-100 visibility score per model and overall.
Q.03Is CiteGEO free?
Yes, CiteGEO offers a free plan with 1 audit per month across 3 AI models. Paid plans start at $21/month for more audits, all 5 AI models, content briefs, and advanced features.
Q.04What is a RAG Readiness Score?
The RAG Readiness Score measures how well your website is optimized to be discovered and cited by AI models. It analyzes schema markup, semantic HTML, content quality, crawler access, page speed, and AI-specific signals like llms.txt files.
Q.05Which AI models does CiteGEO track?
CiteGEO tracks brand visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Groq so teams can see where they are winning, where they are missing, and how model behavior differs by prompt type.
Q.06Who should use CiteGEO?
CiteGEO is built for founders, SEO teams, content marketers, and agencies that need to monitor how AI systems describe a brand, compare it to competitors, and identify the next actions that improve AI citations.

READY?

Own the answer
layer.

Start free auditNo card · <60s · 5 engines